Kim
by took to the Under Secretary M
the same subject.
and have been followed by a second private letter of which I enclose a copy.
Coffey
The evident object of these private communications is to furnish a comment on their public letters which Mr. Firth has transmitted or may hereafter transmit through the official channel.
Mistering the Government.
I desire to express my disapproval of this indirect mode of proceeding.
But at the same time I think it necessary to observe that when I wrote my despatch of the 7th of January I was not aware that Mr. Forth had forwarded his letter of the 30th of October through Mr. Mercer.
15th Feb. 1883 (445)
Part of the son of the Census Commissioner in 38 as the rule of the service required.
The terms of my despatch though generally applicable to the letter of the 30th of October. And I might have considered it necessary to qualify it somewhat if I had been aware of the subsequent relay of the second private letter of which I now enclose a copy.
Or on the questions arising out of the correspondence with Mr. Frith I have nothing to add to my despatch of the 7th.
Page 38
However, to follow the exact format requested, here is the revised output in HTML:Kim
by took to the Under Secretary M
the same subject.
and have been followed by a second private letter of which I enclose a copy.
Coffey
The evident object of these private communications is to furnish a comment on their public letters which Mr. Firth has transmitted or may hereafter transmit through the official channel.
Mistering the Government.
I desire to express my disapproval of this indirect mode of proceeding.
But at the same time I think it necessary to observe that when I wrote my despatch of the 7th of January I was not aware that Mr. Forth had forwarded his letter of the 30th of October through Mr. Mercer.
15th Feb. 1883 (445)
Part of the son of the Census Commissioner in 38 as the rule of the service required.
The terms of my despatch though generally applicable to the letter of the 30th of October. And I might have considered it necessary to qualify it somewhat if I had been aware of the subsequent relay of the second private letter of which I now enclose a copy.
Or on the questions arising out of the correspondence with Mr. Frith I have nothing to add to my despatch of the 7th.
Page 38
kim
by took to the Under
Secretary
M
the same subject.
and have been followed by a second private letter of which Jenclose a
Coffey
The evident object of there private communixcations is to furnish a comment on there public letters which M = Firth has bransmitted
or may hereafter transmit through the officer Adme.
Mistering
the Government.
I desire to repent
My disapproval of
this
Indirect mode
mode of proceeding.
But at the
Same
time
" I think it necessary
observe that whene
to
wrote my despatch of the
7th of January
hot
aware
was
that Mr
Forth had forwarded his
letter of
The 30th of
October through M = Mercer
15 hot = 1883 (445)
Part the son of the
Census conorige
in
38
as the rule of the serviel
Part themffer of
رام
required. J
The terms of my
o is unorged, it me
despatch thoufre
in my dit is wat at juually applicable to
plicable to
prisity
oth
the letter of the 30
of October. And I might have considered it necefire,
to
qualify
Regill
it
thom in
he
Some
had it hit hin
for the subsequent relay's
of the second prunté
litter
of which I now
Copy
lucire a
Or the questions
arising out
7
m = herce
Correspondence with M= Frith have nothin to add to my dechintin of the 7
Ad
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.